<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Dodge Answer to the Morelock Family Lawsuit in the Billy Lane Case!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bikerlawblog.com/the-dodge-answer-to-the-morelock-family/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bikerlawblog.com/the-dodge-answer-to-the-morelock-family/</link>
	<description>Biker and Motorcycle Accident Lawyer, Top Biker Lawyer, Biker Attorney, Motorcycle Accident Lawyer, Motorcycle Accident Attorney, Legal Issues, Safety Tips, Videos, Links to Motorcycle and legal sites, Motorcycle Ride Reports and General Personal Injury! For a Free Consultation on Your Motorcycle Accident Case, Call 800-816-1529 x. 1</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2022 22:06:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Norman Gregory Fernandez		</title>
		<link>https://bikerlawblog.com/the-dodge-answer-to-the-morelock-family/#comment-362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norman Gregory Fernandez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am not sure what the Florida abbreviation/codes mean. I know that Alibi is the defense by an accused person of having been elsewhere at the time an alleged offense was committed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Norm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure what the Florida abbreviation/codes mean. I know that Alibi is the defense by an accused person of having been elsewhere at the time an alleged offense was committed.</p>
<p>Norm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norman Gregory Fernandez		</title>
		<link>https://bikerlawblog.com/the-dodge-answer-to-the-morelock-family/#comment-202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norman Gregory Fernandez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I guess I could comment on it in the Family Law Blog. Matter of fact I probably will. Thanks for the new story idea Sandie!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look for a story in the next day or two.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Norm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I could comment on it in the Family Law Blog. Matter of fact I probably will. Thanks for the new story idea Sandie!</p>
<p>Look for a story in the next day or two.</p>
<p>Norm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norman Gregory Fernandez		</title>
		<link>https://bikerlawblog.com/the-dodge-answer-to-the-morelock-family/#comment-184</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norman Gregory Fernandez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 19:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ha Ha thanks for the compliment Sandie. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does sometimes take over a year to prepare a civil trial. Discovery (propounding and responding) takes a long time. This process also includes subpoenaing witnesses, documents, taking depositions, etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The criminal trial is a different matter. A defendant has a right to a speedy trial but can waive that right in order to properly prepare a defense. A delay also helps the prosecution to prepare their case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would assume that the calendar setting in the criminal case is when the actual trial date will be set. Don&#039;t be surprised if the defense request more time!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It really does take time to prepare a case for trial. 99% of the work in a case is done before trial. 1% is the trial itself!! You would not believe how much work goes into preparing a case for trial!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Norm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha Ha thanks for the compliment Sandie. </p>
<p>It does sometimes take over a year to prepare a civil trial. Discovery (propounding and responding) takes a long time. This process also includes subpoenaing witnesses, documents, taking depositions, etc. </p>
<p>The criminal trial is a different matter. A defendant has a right to a speedy trial but can waive that right in order to properly prepare a defense. A delay also helps the prosecution to prepare their case.</p>
<p>I would assume that the calendar setting in the criminal case is when the actual trial date will be set. Don&#8217;t be surprised if the defense request more time!</p>
<p>It really does take time to prepare a case for trial. 99% of the work in a case is done before trial. 1% is the trial itself!! You would not believe how much work goes into preparing a case for trial!!</p>
<p>Norm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norman Gregory Fernandez		</title>
		<link>https://bikerlawblog.com/the-dodge-answer-to-the-morelock-family/#comment-180</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norman Gregory Fernandez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 02:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-180</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not to worry Sandie, I have a thick skin. I argue cases for a living! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I got pissed off when I took the time to write a long comment and it got deleted. They did however put the comment back on. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On my blog no views are censored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway we will see how the case goes and then go from there. If Lane is found guilty than all bets are off. If he is found innocent than he is innocent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will see won&#039;t we. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Norm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to worry Sandie, I have a thick skin. I argue cases for a living! </p>
<p>I got pissed off when I took the time to write a long comment and it got deleted. They did however put the comment back on. </p>
<p>On my blog no views are censored.</p>
<p>Anyway we will see how the case goes and then go from there. If Lane is found guilty than all bets are off. If he is found innocent than he is innocent.</p>
<p>We will see won&#8217;t we. </p>
<p>Norm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norman Gregory Fernandez		</title>
		<link>https://bikerlawblog.com/the-dodge-answer-to-the-morelock-family/#comment-176</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norman Gregory Fernandez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Funny, I just wrote a long post about bikers rights on Cyril&#039;s blog, after your last comment. It was instantly deleted within a minute of it being posted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I sent Cyril an email in protest. I will no longer be posting comments on his Blog until I get an explanation of why my last comment was deleted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Update:&lt;/strong&gt; My last comment is back on Cryil&#039;s Blog so I will continue to post comments on his Blog.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My comment was about not about Lane per se and was more about cagers killing bikers!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am glad that Cyril or his editors did the right thing and put the comment back up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keep Both Wheels on the Road!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Norm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I just wrote a long post about bikers rights on Cyril&#8217;s blog, after your last comment. It was instantly deleted within a minute of it being posted.</p>
<p>I sent Cyril an email in protest. I will no longer be posting comments on his Blog until I get an explanation of why my last comment was deleted.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> My last comment is back on Cryil&#8217;s Blog so I will continue to post comments on his Blog.</p>
<p>My comment was about not about Lane per se and was more about cagers killing bikers!</p>
<p>I am glad that Cyril or his editors did the right thing and put the comment back up.</p>
<p>Keep Both Wheels on the Road!</p>
<p>Norm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norman Gregory Fernandez		</title>
		<link>https://bikerlawblog.com/the-dodge-answer-to-the-morelock-family/#comment-172</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norman Gregory Fernandez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-172</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I did the post.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Norm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did the post.</p>
<p>Norm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norman Gregory Fernandez		</title>
		<link>https://bikerlawblog.com/the-dodge-answer-to-the-morelock-family/#comment-164</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norman Gregory Fernandez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 18:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sandie you do not have to pay any fee for me to post a comment!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will get to it later today. Plus I promised Mike some comments too. I will try to write up another article on the Lane case later tonight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Norm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandie you do not have to pay any fee for me to post a comment!!</p>
<p>I will get to it later today. Plus I promised Mike some comments too. I will try to write up another article on the Lane case later tonight.</p>
<p>Norm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norman Gregory Fernandez		</title>
		<link>https://bikerlawblog.com/the-dodge-answer-to-the-morelock-family/#comment-159</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norman Gregory Fernandez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have no clue; it is State specific. I am a California Lawyer. A subpoena Deuces Tecum is a subpoena for writings, records, or things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this from the criminal docket in the Lane case? If so, call the Court Clerk for an explanation of the abbreviations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Norm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no clue; it is State specific. I am a California Lawyer. A subpoena Deuces Tecum is a subpoena for writings, records, or things.</p>
<p>Is this from the criminal docket in the Lane case? If so, call the Court Clerk for an explanation of the abbreviations.</p>
<p>Norm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norman Gregory Fernandez		</title>
		<link>https://bikerlawblog.com/the-dodge-answer-to-the-morelock-family/#comment-157</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norman Gregory Fernandez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-157</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with you Sandie that DC should have checked Lane out before they gave him or loaned him the truck. That is the whole point about Negligent Entrustment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With respect to the criminal part of the case, it will be up to a Jury to decide. In our country everyone is innocent until proven guilty. It is easy to convict someone based upon press statements, but it is a whole different matter to actually hear the evidence at trial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will say this, if what I have heard and read is true, than they should fry Lane; he killed an innocent driver while driving intoxicated and on a suspended license. The only way to know if what we have heard and read is true, is to wait for the trial!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the civil end; these are the kind of cases that I do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With respect to Lane doing biker events; I am surprised to say the least. But then again, he has not been convicted of anything yet. If he gets convicted I am sure it will be a whole different matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Norm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Sandie that DC should have checked Lane out before they gave him or loaned him the truck. That is the whole point about Negligent Entrustment.</p>
<p>With respect to the criminal part of the case, it will be up to a Jury to decide. In our country everyone is innocent until proven guilty. It is easy to convict someone based upon press statements, but it is a whole different matter to actually hear the evidence at trial.</p>
<p>I will say this, if what I have heard and read is true, than they should fry Lane; he killed an innocent driver while driving intoxicated and on a suspended license. The only way to know if what we have heard and read is true, is to wait for the trial!</p>
<p>On the civil end; these are the kind of cases that I do.</p>
<p>With respect to Lane doing biker events; I am surprised to say the least. But then again, he has not been convicted of anything yet. If he gets convicted I am sure it will be a whole different matter.</p>
<p>Norm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norman Gregory Fernandez		</title>
		<link>https://bikerlawblog.com/the-dodge-answer-to-the-morelock-family/#comment-154</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norman Gregory Fernandez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-154</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your comments John. Yes the law is my passion. You either have it or you don&#039;t.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With respect to discovery; I would think that DC would still have an affirmative duty to check Lane out before giving him a loaner vehicle, notwithstanding him attesting contractually that he has nothing on his driving record to preclude him from operating the truck.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way I am sure that DC will or has already cross-complained against Lane for equitable indemnity anyway. The real issue is whether Lane could cover the Judgment is he loses the cross-complaint?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to be a fly on the wall at the Plaintiff&#039;s firm to see what their plan is. I know what I would do!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Norm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments John. Yes the law is my passion. You either have it or you don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>With respect to discovery; I would think that DC would still have an affirmative duty to check Lane out before giving him a loaner vehicle, notwithstanding him attesting contractually that he has nothing on his driving record to preclude him from operating the truck.</p>
<p>Either way I am sure that DC will or has already cross-complained against Lane for equitable indemnity anyway. The real issue is whether Lane could cover the Judgment is he loses the cross-complaint?</p>
<p>I would like to be a fly on the wall at the Plaintiff&#8217;s firm to see what their plan is. I know what I would do!!</p>
<p>Norm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norman Gregory Fernandez		</title>
		<link>https://bikerlawblog.com/the-dodge-answer-to-the-morelock-family/#comment-117</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norman Gregory Fernandez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-117</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sandie I am sure that his lawyers have told Lane the best case and worst case scenarios on the outcome of his case. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would make sense for a criminal and civil defendant to get their financial house in order in case they were to lose their legal cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With respect to the drivers license issue; I can only offer advice on California law. If you are a resident of the State of California you may get a California drivers license. If you move to California and you drive, you must obtain a California drivers license within 30 days. If you have a drivers license from another State you must disclose this fact to the California DMV. I am not aware of any law at least in California that precludes you from being licensed in another State or Nation. However, I would assume that you must be a resident of another State in order to be licensed in that State. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am sure that there are many people who hold DL&#039;s in multiple States because they fail to tell their respective DMV&#039;s that they have moved out of State.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Norm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandie I am sure that his lawyers have told Lane the best case and worst case scenarios on the outcome of his case. </p>
<p>It would make sense for a criminal and civil defendant to get their financial house in order in case they were to lose their legal cases.</p>
<p>With respect to the drivers license issue; I can only offer advice on California law. If you are a resident of the State of California you may get a California drivers license. If you move to California and you drive, you must obtain a California drivers license within 30 days. If you have a drivers license from another State you must disclose this fact to the California DMV. I am not aware of any law at least in California that precludes you from being licensed in another State or Nation. However, I would assume that you must be a resident of another State in order to be licensed in that State. </p>
<p>I am sure that there are many people who hold DL&#8217;s in multiple States because they fail to tell their respective DMV&#8217;s that they have moved out of State.</p>
<p>Norm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norman Gregory Fernandez		</title>
		<link>https://bikerlawblog.com/the-dodge-answer-to-the-morelock-family/#comment-103</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norman Gregory Fernandez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 05:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-103</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Indeed. There is a prejudice amongst the jury against bikers. This prejudice may work both ways since Morelock was also on a street legal scooter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will see how it goes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Norm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. There is a prejudice amongst the jury against bikers. This prejudice may work both ways since Morelock was also on a street legal scooter.</p>
<p>We will see how it goes.</p>
<p>Norm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norman Gregory Fernandez		</title>
		<link>https://bikerlawblog.com/the-dodge-answer-to-the-morelock-family/#comment-99</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norman Gregory Fernandez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-99</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the kind words Nancy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Norm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words Nancy.</p>
<p>Norm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sandie Diephouse		</title>
		<link>https://bikerlawblog.com/the-dodge-answer-to-the-morelock-family/#comment-102</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandie Diephouse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-102</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with Nancy that you and Mike Odom have kept people that are following the BILLY LANE criminal and civil cases well informed. I think that the local newspaper is keeping off the subject. One must remember the Dr. Sam Sheperd case in Ohio many years ago. One wants to be able to seat impartial jurors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Nancy that you and Mike Odom have kept people that are following the BILLY LANE criminal and civil cases well informed. I think that the local newspaper is keeping off the subject. One must remember the Dr. Sam Sheperd case in Ohio many years ago. One wants to be able to seat impartial jurors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sandie Diephouse		</title>
		<link>https://bikerlawblog.com/the-dodge-answer-to-the-morelock-family/#comment-115</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandie Diephouse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-115</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have a friend from Indianapolis visiting here in Melbourne, Florida. She decided that she just had to have her &quot;BOOB&quot; autographed by Billy Lane. We went to Choppers,Inc. and was greeted at the door and told that Billy had laid off his staff there and the retail store was closed to the public. If you want a BILLY shirt you must now buy it from his online store. Just want to save somebody from a wasted trip if they are expecting to get their boob signed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a friend from Indianapolis visiting here in Melbourne, Florida. She decided that she just had to have her &#8220;BOOB&#8221; autographed by Billy Lane. We went to Choppers,Inc. and was greeted at the door and told that Billy had laid off his staff there and the retail store was closed to the public. If you want a BILLY shirt you must now buy it from his online store. Just want to save somebody from a wasted trip if they are expecting to get their boob signed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
