Category Archives: Regulations

Articles related to regulations that affect motorcycles

Breaking News- Anaheim, California – DUI Checkpoints and Patrols Scheduled for Today, Saturday, October 17th, 2009, and Sunday, October 18, 2009, and more!

Anaheim dui checkpoints and rousting bikers and motorcyclistThe following is directly from a press release from the Anaheim Police Department. It was not written by me.

### Beginning of Press Release.

The Anaheim Police Department host a total of 6 Sobriety and Drivers License checkpoints, starting with one on Harbor Boulevard near La Palma Park on Saturday, October 17, 2009 from 8:00 PM to 3:00 AM Sunday, October 18, 2009. In addition to checking for DUI drivers, officers will be checking those driving with suspended licenses. Safe driving pamphlets will be handed out to drivers screened at the checkpoint. Checkpoints are designed to bring DUI awareness to the most number of drivers.

The Anaheim Police Department has been awarded a DUI enforcement and awareness grant to combat DUI for a total of $205,115. Funding for this program is provided through a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. This funding will supplement the departments’ overall commitment to lower DUI related traffic collisions. These additional monies will fund additional sobriety checkpoints, DUI patrols and other efforts to help bring about a zero level of DUI in the city of Anaheim.

The additional saturation patrols funded by the grant will increase the number of officers in the field to help assist the program “Report Drunk Drivers: Call 9-1-1”. With the grant’s funding, Anaheim Police will add 4 additional officers to the field nearly every weekend during the next twelve months. These additional officers will be able to respond quicker to 9-1-1 calls by those reporting erratic drivers on our streets. New this time is the addition of the OTS Motorcycle Safety Campaign.

The Anaheim Police will conduct four Motorcycle Safety and Enforcement programs over the next year. The department will take to the streets and focus on the motorcycle rider. Officers plan on working with motorcycle shops, clubs and dealers in the area to first educate the rider and then ensure they are in compliance with the law. DUI and the proper use of helmets will be the first on the list as these are the primary causes of death and serious injury to the motorcycle riding public.

For any media questions, contact Sergeant Rick Martinez at (714) 497-6608 or email him at Rmartinez@anaheim.net

## End of Press Release.

Notice the part about the motorcycle safety and enforcement programs. It looks like the writing is on the wall in Anaheim and they are going to start rousting bikers, motorcycle riders, and shops. If this occurs, I say boycott Anaheim. We have a right to be on the street too.

California Motorcycle Accident Lawyer and Biker Attorney

Share

The State of California’s Ridiculous Plan to do Smog test on Motorcycles.

California Motorcycle Accident Attorney Norman Gregory Fernandez discusses California proposed smog tests for motorcycles in California ** 6/2/09 Update: California State Senator Fran Pavley a few months ago made herself motorcycle public enemy number one in California after she introduced legislation that would have required smog checks for all motorcycles of model year 2000 or newer. The bill proposed to start enforcing the measure in 2012, but that has now been changed.

The proposal has been amended to authorize police officers to fine bikers who have removed catalytic converters, instead of requiring the emissions testing. The senate approved the amended bill which now goes to the state assembly. If it passes there, the Governors signature is all that will be needed to make it law..

In reality the cost of policing the original measure, in relation to the minuscule amount of pollution a motorcycle puts out, just did not make sense when the two factors were weighed out under the original plan.

So under the new proposal, the police will now be able stop and fine bikers with allegedly modified stock systems. This is worse then the smog bill proposal. How are we supposed to prove to a police officer that our smog system on the motorcycle has not been tampered with? This notion is absured and puts too much discrestion in Police officer hands.

Make sure you keep writing your state senators!

*** 5/27/09 Update: A California State Senator has informed me of the following: “Due to the fiscal costs associated with SB 435, it has been placed on the Senate Appropriations legislative suspense file.” It appears that this bill has been placed on the shelf for now!

Well leave it to the California state legislature’s to come up with another dumb idea that may cost many people their jobs, will have no significant impact on air-quality, can be easily skirted, and will serve as another way for the state to take our money through backend taxes.

Welcome to California State Senate Bill 435, (“SB 435”) our State lawmaker’s idiocy at its finest. You may think that as a Biker Lawyer I would embrace more laws; wrong, I embrace laws that are reasonable, not laws that are just meant to discriminate and unjustly tax a class of citizens. SB 435 is meant to do just that, unjustly tax and discriminate against Motorcycle riders and bikers. Don’t let anyone lead you to believe otherwise.

The proponents of SB 435 are selling the bill as a means to clean up California’s air and to ensure that motorcyclist and bikers do not modify their exhaust systems.

There are many problems with SB 435, namely; there are already laws that prohibit motorcyclist and bikers from modifying their exhaust. Therefore this bill is duplicative. Secondly, it is very easy for a motorcyclist or biker to simply put their stock exhaust pipes on for a smog test, and then remove them after the test. The bill is asinine. Thirdly, motorcycles make up a tiny fraction of gas powered motor vehicles on the road today. There is no valid evidence whatsoever that SB 435 will clean up the air at all. Hell if you want to clean up the air, why not force everyone to put catalytic converters over their cooking ovens and at restaurants? Actually I better not give the legislatures any ideas. They actually sit around on capital hill thinking up shit.

SB 435 is all about hype and further discriminating against motorcyclist and bikers.

With a State already in a budget crisis, the States plan under SB 435 would cost untold millions of dollars to implement, and ad an added tax by way of fees to motorcyclist and bikers who are already pay enough taxes. As the old saying goes, you cannot squeeze blood out of a turnip.

Every Californian who cares about freedom should contact their State Representative and give them a piece of your mind, and tell them to vote no on SB 435. Our State is in fiscal crisis, we certainly do not need any more regulation that will put people out of jobs, cost millions to implement, cost motorist more money in a back end tax, with no real benefit to the people of the State of California.

It is easier to prevent a dingbat scheme like this from being signed into law, then to reverse the law once it is put into place, as we all learned with helmet laws in the State. Therefore it is imperative that we fight this proposed Senate Bill Now!

What if the law is enacted? Simple, put your stock pipes back on for the smog test. I will not give advice on what do after the test!
I am sure that many of you have sold or given away your stock pipes. Bad move. You should at all costs keep your stock pipes now. Hell why pay another 500-600 bucks to get another set of stockers simply to pass a smog test.

Smog test or no smog test, they will not get rid of us motorcyclist and bikers just yet! I just prefer not to have to pay a back end tax based on a law that has no demonstrative results and is useless.

By California Motorcycle Accident Attorney and Biker Lawyer Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq., © 2009

Share

Dirt Bikes (Motorcycles) and ATV Sales Intended for Children 12 and Under Are Now Illegal.

California Motorcycle Accident Attorney Norman Gregory Fernandez discusses the Federal Ban on Dirt Bikes and ATVs for children under 12A new federal law bans the sale of off-road vehicles made for kids under 12, part of a broader measure aimed at preventing lead poisoning in children. This law, effective February 10, 2009, cracked down on the selling of those hazardous items.

Retailers say the law is overly broad and children have a minuscule risk of lead exposure from engine components and other parts of the vehicles.

The federal Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, born amid outcries over children getting sick from lead components in toys imported from China, puts in place new strict standards for testing and safety in a wide range of toys used by children, including ATVs.

For now, all models must be pulled until tests can be developed to detect lead, or until industry advocates succeed in getting models exempted from the law.

That means retailers across the country are stuck with inventory sitting in their showrooms that they might not ever be able to sell. The law could cost the industry $1 billion for this year alone, according to an estimate from the Specialty Vehicle Institute of America and the Motorcycle Industry Council.

There is a safety concern among off-roaders. Kids’ vehicles sport small engines, weigh less and go slower. If parents can’t get the smaller-sized bikes because of the ban, they might buy the bigger ones. And the children might not be able to handle them.

I will tell you what, the way things are going with Federal Legislation, it won’t be long before the Feds outlaw kids’ using knifes to eat with. Geez. I think they have gone way too far with this law.

Look don’t get me wrong, I think that children should be protected from many things. But in this particular instance, I think it should be up to parents as to whether their children should ride junior sized dirt bikes or ATV’s.

Hell when I was 5 or 6, my dad first put me on a mini-bike. My cousins and I spent many fine days in the desert and near Lake Elsinore, riding our motocross bikes.

I was racing motocross at the Irwindale Raceway in the 80cc division at a young age.

With the new laws, a whole generation of kids will not enjoy the pleasures of dirt biking unless they get on something meant for adults. The law actually makes it more dangerous for them.

I say, everyone should write their congressmen and tell them that this new law is asinine.

The new legislation will also ding a billion dollars of commerce from our economy while we are in a depression.

By California Motorcycle Accident and Biker Lawyer, Norman Gregory Fernandez, © 2009

Share

New Laws for 2009 in the State of California.

California motorcycle accident attorney Norman Gregory Fernandez discusses new California laws for 2009Here are some of the new laws which went effect on January 1, 2009:

No-text Law
Writing, sending, or reading a “text-based communication” while driving will be against the law for all drivers in California. Violating this law is punishable by a base fine of $20 for a first offense and $50 for each subsequent offense. With the addition of penalty assessments, fines can be more than triple the base fine amount.

Mounting GPS on Windshield
You may now mount a GPS on the lower right or lower left part of your windshield so long as it does not interfere with any air bag device. In the past nothing could be mounted to your windshield.

Smoking with a minor in the Car
It is now an infraction to smoke a cigarette, cigar, or pipe in a car whether it is in motion or at rest if a minor child is in the car with you. This applies even if you are pulled over to the side of the road.

Definition of a motorcycle
Deleting the existing weight limitation of 1,500 pounds, removes a separate definition for electrically powered vehicles and will allow fully enclosed 3-wheeled motor vehicles to use the carpool lanes.

New DUI Laws — Zero tolerance
Any person who is on probation for a DUI convection cannot drive with a blood alcohol level of.01 percent.

Unlicensed car dealersLaw-enforcement officers can impound vehicles that are being sold by unlicensed dealers.

Temporary operating permits restricted
The DMV will restrict permits to allow more time to obtain a smog certificate.

Counterfeit Clean Air Stickers
It will be a crime to forge Clean Air Stickers, which are issued to low-emission vehicles and allow the vehicles with these stickers to be driven in carpool lanes.

Special interest license plates
Gold Star Family special interest license plates will be available to family members who have had family killed in the line of duty while serving in the Armed Forces during wartime or military operations.

Temporary employees
Wages for employees of temporary services employers shall be paid weekly or daily if the work less than 90 days.

Family and Medical Leave Act
Families who have members who are active in the military are eligible up to 12 weeks of leave if they meet the “qualifying exigencies: short notice deployment, attendance at official military events or activities, arranging or providing childcare, attending school or daycare meetings, handling financial and legal matters, and rest and recuperation visits when the soldier is on leave.”

I must caution you that this is only a partial list of new laws in California for 2009.

By California Motorcycle Accident Attorney and Biker Lawyer Norman Gregory Fernandez, © 2009

Share

Oakland, California Police modify their Mufflers to make them Louder!

oakland motorcycle accident attorneyOakland has spent $15,000 on mufflers to make their police department’s Harleys safer — and noisier than federal standards. Chronicle photo by Kat Wade

Over in Oakland they like it loud – so loud that all 45 of the Police Department’s Harley-Davidson motorcycles have been equipped with shiny new tailpipes, at a cost of $500 apiece, to rev up their roar.

It seems the cops just didn’t feel safe on toned-down bikes.

“There’s an old motorcycle adage that you are heard before you are seen,” said Deputy Chief Dave Kozicki, explaining the department’s decision to toss the bikes’ muted factory-issued mufflers in favor of the more high-volume pipes.

Kozicki cited an accident three months ago in which an Oakland officer riding a toned-down cycle was struck by a motorist who said he hadn’t heard the officer approaching.
But some City Hall insiders, as well as motorcycle cops elsewhere, said the safety argument is a stretch.

Even the folks at the national Motorcycle Industry Council, which represents all the big bike manufacturers, were unaware of any safety benefits from louder mufflers.

“We encourage all motorcycle riders to keep the original low sound levels that meet the … federal sound limit of 80 decibels,” said industry spokesman Mike Mount. “It would seem counterintuitive that a law enforcement agency would go against federal standards.”
Ironically, it was just a short time back that Oakland police were called upon to crack down on noisy motorists who had modified their auto mufflers to make a whistling screech. The “whistle tip” pipes were eventually outlawed under state law.

Oakland’s cops had a long tradition of riding their Harley-Davidsons with the modified, louder tail pipes, earning them the nickname “Rolling Thunder.” But after an officer complained about a loss of hearing and others around town questioned whether the police force was violating the very noise standards it was supposed to enforce, the department brass ordered a switch to the quieter stock mufflers.

According to Kozicki, the decibel drop sparked a chorus of complaints from other officers, who said they felt less safe.

So last year the department launched a $1,200 study in conjunction with the city’s risk management division to determine whether A) the louder motorcycles contributed to officers’ safety, B) were detrimental to their hearing, and C) complied with noise standards.

Kozicki acknowledged that whatever safety-related findings the study produced were largely anecdotal. Still, after everything was taken into consideration, the department concluded “it was in the best interest of the officers to put more-audible pipes back on,” Kozicki said.

Hence, all 30 of the department’s Harleys were sent down to the central maintenance yard for a muffler makeover, at a cost of about $15,000, according to City Hall insiders. Another 15 newly purchased motorcycles were ordered with the louder pipes, though at no extra charge.

Oakland officials acknowledge that the noisy pipes, when tested, averaged 93 decibels – well above the federal legal noise limit, according to the Motorcycle Industry Council.
But city Finance Director Bill Nolan, who oversees the risk management division, isn’t alarmed.

“If they were riding eight straight hours, it would be a problem,” he said. “But they aren’t.”

Oakland California Motorcycle Accident Lawyer

Share

When a Dangerous Condition on Public Roads Causes a Motorcycle Accident; What Do You Do?

California motorcycle accident lawyer Norman Gregory Fernandez discusses claims against public entitiesI have handled many motorcycle accidents that were caused solely by dangerous conditions on public roads and highways. Many bikers and motorcyclists don’t realize it, but when a dangerous condition on a public road causes a motorcycle accident, in many circumstances a public entity might be responsible not only for the accident, but for your damages that result therefrom.

These types of accidents are not your garden-variety rear renderer, left-hand turn, or vehicle on vehicle accidents. A motorcycle accident due to a dangerous condition on a public road is a much more complicated type of case.

I have handled cases that run the gambit of dangerous conditions on public roads such as; potholes on the road that made the road look like a moonscape; large sinkholes on public streets; stop sign hidden by brush; rock like outcroppings on what should be a smooth street; construction crews failing to warn motorists that they were doing construction ahead, etc.

The reason these types of cases are complicated is because they don’t have a simple defendant or two, and their insurance company to deal with. In these types of motorcycle accident cases, 99% of the time you’ll be going after a public entity such as a city, county, or even a state. If the accident occurred on federal property such as a military base, you might be going after the federal government. In this article I will only be dealing with a state claims, or public entities within states.

One thing is for certain, if you are the victim of this type of accident, whereby the accident was due to a dangerous condition on public roads, or highways, you’ll need to retain a competent attorney that knows how to deal with such claims.

You are not going to want to hire a personal injury firm that is a settlement mill, or a firm that advertises that they handle motorcycle accidents, but have no attorneys that actually ride motorcycles. You are going to want to hire experienced motorcycle accident attorneys that not only ride motorcycles and are familiar with dangerous conditions on public roads, but are also experienced in doing with such claims against governmental entities, as well as lawsuits against governmental entities.

My law firm has handled many such claims against governmental entities all over the state of California. The bottom line is that not only motorcyclists, but all motorists whether they were riding in cars or trucks, deserved to have a road, highway, or freeway that is free from dangerous conditions.

These are not the type of cases that a person who is injured wants to wait to retain an attorney on. You see you only have six months under the California Government code to file a claim against the governmental entity for your personal injuries, and property damage. If you fail to file a claim within six months, you may be apply to the governmental entity for leave to file a claim, however applications for leave to file a claim are almost always denied. In other words, if you don’t file the claim against the governmental entity within six months, your shit out of luck and will have lost your ability to file a lawsuit for your injuries.

In my experience, 99.99% of all claims against governmental entities are either rejected or denied. If the governmental entity formally rejects a claim for personal injuries in writing, you’ll then have only six months to file a lawsuit against that government entity. Basically, all such claims eventually result in us having to sue the governmental entity.

If you have suffered a personal injury whether it be due to a car accident, motorcycle accident, truck accident, or other motor vehicle accident, due to a dangerous condition in a public road, highway, or freeway in the state of California do not mess around. Call my office at 800-816-1529, extension 1. We will tell you over the phone if you have a good case.

By California motorcycle accident lawyer Norman Gregory Fernandez, © 2008

Share

Does Being Overweight Affect Your Rights in a Motorcycle Accident Case?

California Motorcycle Accident Attorney Norman Gregory Fernandez discusses whether being overweight will affect you in a motorcycle accident case.First off, if you are overweight and a biker, I hope you do not take this article the wrong way. This article will discuss two things: (1) does being overweight affect your rights in a motorcycle accident case; and (2) does being overweight affect your ability to ride a motorcycle.

I will first discuss how being overweight may or may not affect your ability to ride a motorcycle.

As many of you probably already know, obesity is a huge problem in the United States of America.

For instance, I just got back from walking at the shopping mall. I would say that well over 50% of the people in the mall were not only overweight, but what I consider to be obese.

Notwithstanding this fact, I do not see why a person who is overweight cannot safely operate a motorcycle. As a matter of fact, I personally know people who I would consider to be obese, and yet are outstanding motorcycle riders.

Being overweight may be a consideration with respect to that type of motorcycle a person may want to ride, such as a sport motorcycle v. cruiser type of motorcycle. It may be more comfortable for a person who is obese or overweight to select the cruiser type of motorcycle. The way I look at it, to each their own.

A motorcycle rider, whether they are skinny, medium build, or overweight, should take an appropriate motorcycle safety course, when beginning to ride, and maintain their skills; however I do not see weight being a factor one way or another.

With respect to the issue of whether being overweight, would affect your rights in a motorcycle accident case, I would say no, unless you as a motorcycle rider are somehow at fault. I wrote an article previously discussing how pre-existing conditions should not affect a personal injury case. You can read that article by clicking here now.

In human nature there is a tendency to discriminate against people who are different. This holds true for people who are overweight or obese, who are also the victims of discrimination. If you are overweight, and have been in a motorcycle accident, you are going to want to retain an attorney, who knows how to deal with the issue of pre-existing conditions, and a jury’s tendency to discriminate against people who are different.

I am that type of attorney. As an example of a worst-case scenario type of motorcycle accident case; I am representing a man from northern California, who sustained horrendous injuries in a motorcycle accident. Months prior to his accident, he had surgery to put a band around his stomach so that he could lose weight. At the time of his accident, he was obviously extremely overweight. Notwithstanding this fact, he was rear ended by a negligent cager. Among other injuries, the surgeons had to go back into his body to reinstall the band around his stomach.

My firm will eventually get this gentleman, a very high settlement or judgment for his injuries. You see a defendant has to take a plaintiff as he finds them. This holds true whether the defendant is obese, or has other pre-existing conditions.

If you are overweight, obese, or have other pre-existing conditions, and have been the victim of a motorcycle, or other motor vehicle accident, you may call my law firm for a free consultation at 800-816-1529, extension 1. I will tell you over the phone whether you have a good case.

By California Motorcycle Accident Attorney Norman Gregory Fernandez, © 2008

Share

News Alert; The City of Long Beach is Beefing Up Enforcement Against Motorcycles With Loud Pipes!

california biker lawyer norman gregory fernandez discusses the city of long beach, california cracking down on motorcycles with loud pipesLONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA – Long Beach police said on Friday they will be beefing up their enforcement of motorcycle noise, particularly on Ocean Boulevard.

It is illegal in California to modify a motorcycle’s exhaust to make it louder; the citable limit for noise in the state is 95 decibels.

Cmdr. Jay Johnson of the Long Beach Police Department’s South Division said more complaints have been reaching police in the past few weeks and some residents are doing noise-detector readings that show illegal motorcycle riding.

“This is not a new problem, particularly on Ocean Boulevard,” Johnson said. “But as there’s more development and as more people move into that area, the more complaints of noise come. And it becomes a quality-of-life issue.”

Johnson will be deploying some officers during peak motorcycle riding times to listen for noise and write citations.

“My hope is that people will know the law and not come rip-roaring up Ocean Boulevard,” Johnson said. “If they do, they will be cited.”

So there you have it, Long Beach is the latest Southern California city to begin discriminating against bikers and motorcyclist.

I have no reason to believe that Commander Jay Johnson is playing around, and that they are going to go after what they consider to be loud motorcycles.

In my experience, the Police use the excuse of so-called loud pipes, and/or loud motorcycles to justify pulling any biker or motorcycle rider over that they want. Even motorcycles that have not been modified. It is not right. Many big rig trucks are much louder than motorcycles. Why are they not being singled out for enforcement?

Heck, Long Beach is the largest port in the nation. Everyday thousands upon thousands of big rig trucks pick up and deliver from the port of Long Beach. The noise that they make is deafening! Why not go after them?

I would like to hear about any real enforcement that the City of Long Beach is doing with regards to citing so-called loud motorcycles. If they in fact are citing regular motorcycles just for the sake of filling the cities coffers, then I will call for a total boycott of the City of Long Beach by all bikers and motorcyclist.

Any city that wants to single us out does not deserve our money.

By Long Beach Motorcycle Accident Lawyer Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq., 2008

Share

California Ban on Use of Cell Phone Without Hand Free Begins July 1, 2008! What You Need to Know about the New Law.

california biker lawyer norman gregory fernandez discusses the new ban on holding cell phones while driving in californiaOn July 1, after a nearly two-year grace period, a new era begins in California: holding a cell phone to your ear and talking while driving will be illegal unless it is an emergency.

In most cases, you will still be able to talk-and-drive, but you will need a hands-free device to do so such as a bluetooth headset, speakerphone set up, or a wired headset.

What Exactly is the New Law?

(1) If you are 18 or older, you are prohibited from holding a phone and talking while driving.

(2) If you are 16 or 17, the only time you can use a cell phone while driving is in an emergency only.

(3) The first offense of the cell phone law will result in a $20 ticket. Subsequent citations will result in $50 tickets. However, with court costs and penalties, the true costs of these tickets will be approximately $76 and $190, respectively.

Here is something else to think about: The new laws go into effect just days before the California Highway Patrol goes on “maximum patrol” throughout the Fourth of July weekend. This means that 80% of CHP officers will have their eyes on the road, and on you and your cell phone.

If it is illegal to hold a phone while talking, how is it possible to dial it or press a button to answer the phone or take a call, even if you talk hands-free?

This is where things may get a bit dicey because the laws are silent on these issues.

The Law basically only bans talking on the cell phone without a hands free device for non emergency calls, therefore, you are allowed to touch the phone to make a call or take one, said Mike Marando, a spokesman for the state Department of Motor Vehicles. “As long as you don’t hold the phone to carry the conversation,” he added.

Will text messaging while driving in California be illegal?

Text messaging will be illegal only for 16 and 17 year-old drivers. The law silent as to adults. I strongly recommend that no one text message while driving!

Tom Marshall, a CHP spokesman, has stated that “If you are text messaging and we see it’s affecting your driving, we can still pull you over” for distracted driving.

The offense is not distracted driving or, for example, driving with a bag of French fries in your lap. What Police actually cite you for what happens as a result of being inattentive, such as impeding traffic or an improper lane change.

Will getting a ticket for talking on a cell phone result in a higher insurance rate for motorists?

No. But there is a chance that it could eventually.

Cell phone violations will not result in any points being tacked onto your driving record — insurance carriers use those points to determine if you’re a good or bad driver. But the tickets are still on your driving record.

Darrel Ng, a spokesman for the California Department of Insurance, said that in the future, carriers might apply to the state to use tickets when setting rates, although they’d likely have to prove a correlation between getting those tickets and accident rates.

What other states have similar laws, and how are those working out?

New York was the first state to institute a hand-held ban, beginning in 2001, and Connecticut and New Jersey have followed suit.

From 2001 through 2006, police in New York issued 976,725 citations to motorists for holding their phones while driving.

Even more interesting, the number of citations has increased each year, with 285,684 tickets being given in 2006, the latest year for which numbers are available.

With more than 11.3 million licensed drivers in New York, it’s probably safe to assume that an awful lot of people are not getting caught.

What are some ways to comply with the laws without spending a lot of money?

First and foremost, learn how to use the voice recognition system that comes with most cell phones. Voice recognition usually requires users to touch only one button and then say a person’s name to make a call.

Surely the much talked-about Apple iPhone, which starts at $399, comes with voice recognition?

No, it doesn’t. It is a feature you can get with a BlackBerry phone or many standard phones.

What are some other ways to go hands-free?

There is no shortage of devices out there. Here are three easy ways to be a go hands free:

(1) Buy a cheap cell phone cradle that mounts to a vehicle’s dashboard. A conversation can then be carried on using the phone’s speakerphone function. Cost: $15 and under at automotive stores.

Tip: If your vehicle’s stereo system has an auxiliary jack, you can play your phone through the vehicle’s speakers, which makes it easier to hear.

(2) Use a headset. Most phones come with an earpiece or you can easily upgrade to a wireless bluetooth headset that syncs to your phone.

Wireless bluetooth headsets typically cost between $30 and $120, and many are available.

(3) Use a wireless speaker. These mouse-sized devices can be clipped to a sun visor and are a lesser-known alternative to the wireless earpiece. Motorola and Parrot are two prominent manufacturers.

Will the new laws prevent motorcycle accidents and/or make bikers safer?

Based upon research that I have done, the experts seem to agree that most of the problem is not the act of holding the cell phone while driving, but the distraction of talking while driving. If they are right simply holding a conversation with someone in your car is as dangerous as talking on a cell phone.

As a Biker who also happens to be a motorcycle accident lawyer, I beg to differ. While riding I see many people holding their phones to their heads which hinders their ability to turn their head while driving. When I am riding my motorcycle, I dread seeing cagers talking on cell phones because I know they are not paying attention.

I am hoping the new law will prevent motorcycle accidents but only time will tell.

California Motorcycle Accident Lawyer

Share

Well here we go; State Legislatures are now going after Stunt Riding Sport Motorcycle Riders; The Problem is that all Bikers and Motorcyclist could be Dinged by New Laws!

Caliornia Motorcycle Accident Lawyer Norman Gregory Fernandez discusses Florida's proposed new motorcycle reckless driving law.The State of Florida has proposed a new law HB137 2008, which is geared specifically towards bikers and motorcyclist. I will call it the Florida Reckless Motorcycle Law.

The gist of the new law is that if a law enforcement officer charges a person with reckless driving, or driving 30mph over the speed limit, and who was riding a motorcycle at the time, the officer must arrest the rider, take him or her into custody, and seize the motorcycle, which will be subject to forfeiture under Florida’s Contraband Forfeiture Act. You can read the proposed new law by clicking here.

If that person is convicted under the new law, the Court SHALL order the Department of Motor Vehicles to revoke their motorcycle endorsement. This specifically means that the person will no longer legally be able to ride a motorcycle in the State of Florida.

If you have read my Biker Law Blog for some time you will have heard my calls for the guys who are doing stunts on public roads and highways to cease and desist because they would screw it up for the rest of us. I have also called for other bikers and motorcyclist to put peer pressure on the guys that are doing the stunts on public roads. Now it appears that State Legislatures will start trying to do it for us.

I am against the State of Florida’s HB137 2008 because it puts too much discretion into law enforcements hands with respect to being required to arrest bikers and motorcyclist who are allegedly doing 30mph over the speed limit, or riding recklessly. Furthermore the provision that allows law enforcement to seize the motorcycle and sell it smacks of another government scam to obtain revenue by selling seized motorcycles without first having to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person riding the motorcycle committed a crime. Civil seizure statutes require a different burden of proof than convicting persons of a crime.

You mark my words, if this law passes, you will see bikers and motorcyclist of all types be rousted by law enforcement, losing their motorcycles, and their motorcycle endorsements. This law is another way for law enforcement to discriminate against bikers and motorcyclist.

I am calling all Floridians to contact their legislature and put and end to HB137 2008 because it is discriminatory against bikers and motorcyclist.

If Florida wants such a law, it should be applicable to persons driving any motor vehicle, not just motorcycles, and then maybe the law might be fair if you want to live in a State that can just seize your property on an allegation by law enforcement.

What is wrong with Florida? Recently a city in Florida tried to outright ban motorcycles, but it did not pass.

It is time for us bikers and motorcyclist to start really coming down on the idiots that are doing stunts on public roads with their sport motorcycles, because they are now bringing down heat on all of us.

It is also time for us bikers and motorcyclist to stand up for our rights before they are taken away from us forever!

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq., © 2007

Share

Do not ride your Motorcycle in the State of California without having mandatory minimum Liability Insurance! Check your Insurance People, This is becoming Ridicules!

Motorcycle Lawyer Norman Gregory Fernandez discusses California mandatory minimum insurance requirements.I have had a run of bikers who have had motorcycle accidents call me lately that do not even have basic liability insurance. I am not talking about the type of insurance that will cover your motorcycle in case of an accident for your own property damage. (Comprehensive and Collision Coverage) I am talking about liability coverage that will cover someone or a passenger in case you are at fault in an accident.

The biggest reason you need this insurance is that it required by California State Law. The voters enacted proposition 213 some time ago. The law requires that all drivers of motor vehicles on public roads in the State of California have at least minimum liability coverage’s of $10,000 for property damage, $15,000.00 for bodily injury per person, and $30,000.00 per incident.

You may think; “oh well, I am riding a motorcycle, what damage can I do?” This is not the issue, the issue’s are; (1) You can lose your drivers license for up to a year if you drive without liability insurance, this goes for driving cages too; (2) Your vehicle can be impounded and sold at auction if you are caught driving it with no insurance; and (3) You will face up to a $2,000.00 fine or ticket if you are caught riding or driving without insurance.

If this is not enough to scare you there is more! Proposition 213 precludes anyone who is driving a motor vehicle (motorcycle, car, truck, etc.) on public roads, without the minimum liability insurance coverage, from recovering general damages in an accident! You are only entitled to Special Damages.

What are General Damages? They include pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and emotional distress! These are the big money items that are compensable in a motorcycle accident!

What are Special Damages? They include out of pocket losses such as property damage, medical bills, loss of use of vehicle, etc.

Imagine being taken out in a motorcycle accident, losing a leg, and finding out that you will not recover the big bucks for general damages because you were foolish enough to let your liability insurance lapse and be cancelled!

Most insurance companies give you 30 days to declare a new motorcycle on an existing policy, but I for one do not take any chances. Anytime I buy a new bike, I cover it before I ride it period.

Now my law firm does accept some so-called Proposition 213 cases for bikers and motorcyclist, (Bikers and Motorcyclist who are not at fault but have no liability coverage.) However, the vast majority of all personal injury lawyers reject these types of cases.

Come on guys and gals, get your shit together and at least carry minimum liability insurance coverage just in case! It is required by law, and if you are taken out in an accident that is not your fault you will not be precluded from full compensation, not to mention all of the penalties that go with being an uninsured motorist.

If you have been in a motorcycle or other type of motor vehicle accident anywhere in the State of California, you may call me for a free consultation at 800-816-1529.

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq. © 2007

Share

It looks like Anaheim, California is the latest California City to go after Bikers for loud pipes!

California Motorcycle Lawyer Norman Gregory Fernandez comments on the City of Anaheims new crack down on loud pipes.It looks like Anaheim, California is the latest California City to go after Bikers for loud pipes!

Well here we go again. Rather than using law enforcement resources to go after criminals, drunk drivers, and the like, another California City is instead going after bikers with loud pipes.

If you are thinking about riding through the City of Anaheim, you better think again. They are going after bikers with loud pipes and writing tickets to fill the city coffers like crazy.

Click here to read a story from the Orange County Register on what is happening. It looks to me like this is becoming a nationwide trend and it also looks like it is not going away anytime soon.

I for one will take my money elsewhere. If Anaheim does not like my motorcycle, then they certainly do not like me.

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq., © 2007

Share

Certain towns in Southern California are starting to crack down on loud pipes!

California motorcycle lawyer Norman Gregory Fernandez discusses loud pipes on motorcyclesIt looks like the loud pipe crackdown is starting to spread across the nation. I have written articles about Malibu, California, and Denver, Colorado cracking down on loud pipes. I have now heard reports from people calling my office that certain cities in the Inland Empire are starting to crack down on loud pipes as well.

I have also heard reports from my brothers in Minnesota, that there is a crackdown happening in certain cities there too.

I will again reiterate my position that loud pipes on motorcycles do save lives, because it forces the cagers to notice you! I have received many comments on the Blog from readers who have differing opinions that mine and that is OK.

Free Speech amongst bikers will not be infringed upon in my Blog.

The bottom line is that the law requires that stock exhaust systems not be modified or tampered with. However, it is absurd that a biker or motorcyclist should have to buy OEM exhaust from the manufacturer of their motorcycles in order to be in compliance with the law. They should have a choice as to what pipes they want to put on! This is a free country right?

We all know that there are guys out there running open pipes and that things can get kind of loud. I guess there needs to be a happy medium otherwise we are all going to be screwed into having to run OEM pipes no matter what.

There are many aftermarket systems out there that come with baffles that will quiet the motorcycle down to a reasonable level.

Where I live it is biker valley. There are more registered motorcycles in the San Fernando Valley, California, than any other geographic location of the same size anywhere in the country. I just saw a guy riding down a street called Devonshire, whose bike was so loud that it really was ridicules. You know it takes a lot for me to say that because I advocate that loud pipes save lives.

Nonetheless it is guys like this that are and will cause the crackdown on all of us.

Imagine if cars were running open headers? I know, when I was a teen, I had a souped up Nova with open headers. I was promptly given a ticket and this was in 1979 or 80. I do not remember the exact year.

So what am I saying; let’s keep a happy medium. There is no reason to be running open pipes. You can still have a reasonably loud bike with baffles installed or tuned. Obviously I am not advocating breaking any laws.

For all of you guys with aftermarket pipes, you better do yourself a favor and keep your OEM pipes just in case you get stopped for loud pipes. It is cheaper to just re-install them on your motorcycle if you do get stopped, rather than having to buy a new set.

I kept my OEM’s from Harley Davidson and they are in my garage.

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq., © 2007

Share

I hear a rumor that a lawyer is challenging the Denver Noise Ordinance.

California Motorcycle Lawyer Norman Gregory Fernandez discusses the challenge to the Denver Noise OrdinanceI have been reading articles all over the internet about a lawyer who is challenging the Denver noise ordinance on the basis that Police Motorcycles that are Harley Davidson’s do not meet Denver’s 80 decibel noise standard, therefore the law as enacted is arbitrary and unduly broad.

The trouble with the article I have been reading is that no one has named the lawyer. It is almost like a rumor as far as I am concerned. If someone knows the name of the lawyer, please post a comment on this article so I can contact the lawyer.

I have a big problem with the basis for challenging the law. In most States and municipalities, law enforcement vehicles are exempt from ordinary traffic laws so that they can do their job.

Arguing that the Police stock Harley Davidson Motorcycles that the police in Denver use, do not meet the 80db standard seems almost ludicrous as a basis for setting aside the law. What the argument is basically saying is that no stock Harley Davidson’s would be within the law. This would give the police a basis for pulling over all Harley Davidson Motorcycles!

I do not like where this is going. If anyone has any information on the challenge to the noise law in Denver please contact me. You can also shoot me an email through the system by clicking the email icon next to my name.

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq., © 2007

Share

Transporting a Gun on Your Motorcycle.

California Motorycle Accident Lawyer Attorney Norman Gregory Fernandez discusses transporting firearms on a motorcycle.First off, I am not giving legal advice by this article. You should always check with a lawyer in your respective State on the issue of transporting a gun on a motorcycle or in another type of vehicle. If in doubt, call a lawyer!

Generally Bikers and Motorcyclist are allowed by law to transport a Gun on their motorcycle just like people in Cars or Cagers. I do not want to confuse the issue of transporting a gun, and carrying a gun, they are two different things.

Carrying a gun means that you have it on your person. This article does not cover carrying a gun on your person. The purpose of this article is to discuss the legality of transporting a gun on your motorcycle, especially when crossing State Lines.

There are generally two areas of law dealing with transporting guns in vehicles; Federal, and State Law. The vast majority of States will NOT let you transport a loaded gun in any type of vehicle without a permit, and MOST States have certain restrictions that are applicable to transporting guns in vehicles.

Federal Law generally states that; Notwithstanding any other provision of any law or any rule or regulation of a State or any political subdivision thereof, any person who is not otherwise prohibited by this chapter from transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm shall be entitled to transport a firearm for any lawful purpose from any place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm to any other place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm if, during such transportation the firearm is unloaded, and neither the firearm nor any ammunition being transported is readily accessible or is directly accessible from the passenger compartment of such transporting vehicle: Provided, That in the case of a vehicle without a compartment separate from the driver’s
compartment the firearm or ammunition shall be contained in a locked container other than the glove compartment or console. Code of Federal Regulations Title 18, Part I, Chapter 44, § 926a.

Share
Share


If you have been in a Motorcycle Accident ANYWHERE in The State of California, call me now 24 hours per day, 7 days a week, for a free consultation at 800-816-1Law (800-816-1529), Extension 1

Welcome, my name is Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq. I am a real biker, and a real California Biker and Motorcycle Lawyer. Click on the About Me Tab on Top to find out more about me

I created this site to provide information to the motorcycle and biker community, as well as general California Personal Injury, and Family Law Information to all.

On BikerLawBlog.com you will find Biker and Motorcycle Legal Articles, News, Links, Safety Tips, Personal Injury, Family Law, and more.

If you wish to contact me or submit articles, you may do so by clicking on the Contact Us button above, or by clicking here now